Related Stories Grants Pass Taxes "Families" and "Values" Voters Overwhelmingly Crush Proposed Grants Pass Meals Tax Medford City Council Proposes Unfair Industry Targeted Sales Tax On Meals City of Yachats in No Hurry to Consider Meals Tax Yachats City Council to Decide on Meals Tax Yachats City Council Passes 5% Meals Tax Yachats Meals Tax to be Referred to Voters
Local Meals Tax Preemption
Background
The City of Ashland has a five percent tax on all prepared food sold inside the City of Ashland. Other cities have looked into the possibility of meals taxes in order to generate money for city improvement projects. In one case, the City of Eugene passed a meals tax, which the Oregon Restaurant Association (ORA) helped refer to voters, and was defeated at the polls. Salem, Lincoln City, Bend, Medford, Yachats, Hood River and Cascade Locks are just a few examples of local governments that have considered some type of meals tax. Grants Pass City Council put a sales tax on food to the voters who in turn sent a clear message by voting down the tax proposal by a margin of 77-23.
Issue
Local governments are increasingly singling out industries they see as vulnerable and making efforts to subject them to increased local taxes. Meals taxes are an unfair tactic used by local governments singling out a specific industry to act as a tax collector for their local citizens. Meals taxes are promoted as a way to tax out-of-town visitors. However, statistics show that the vast majority of people who dine out are community members, not out of town visitors. Ninety percent of the restaurants business is derived from the local community. Any industry-specific meals tax creates government-imposed competitive boundaries. A meals tax creates competitive issues among restaurants. In many jurisdictions, local government boundaries literally place competing establishments across the street from one another. A sales tax on meals is a high visibility tax that will encourage consumers to "go across the street" to avoid the tax. There is a misperception that dining out is predominantly enjoyed by higher income citizens. Ashland's quick service restaurants, whose customers come from middle to lower income families, collect a majority of the local tax. Additionally, dining out is no longer a luxury. Every day, citizens use prepared food as a way to accommodate their fast-paced life. The myth that fine dining establishment collect high percentages of taxes is not true.
ORA Position
ORA is opposed to any local sales tax imposed onprepared food. New taxes or fees should only be imposed on retail businesses equally, and considerations must be made regarding any competitive disadvantages such taxes may place on local businesses. Allowing local governments to implement misguided tax policies corrupts the environment for any statewide discussions of major tax reform.
Back